Victory Celebration Early Signup
Be in the first 500 to join our Victory Receptions: Gold, Silver or Early Bronze. The first week will be awards, meetings and fun; the second week will be all fun events.
Date and location is still being determined but all locations will be sunny. Pack for warm weather!
PREFERRED LUXURY PACKAGE (PLP)
Only 500 Preferred Luxury Packages are available for each event! It will be first come first served.
What you get…
- Preferred room (size, view and elevation)
- Victory Reception 7-9 PM with leaders
- Lavish hors d’oeuvres
- Bonus gift
- Photo opportunities
- Free hugs and fantastic memories of our first event
Details and Order here
Frequently Asked Questions
Ambassador Bonus Awards
Guide our members to an abundant receiving/giving life of financial, health, emotional and spiritual freedoms through inner awakening and paying it forward.
Will Smith on Success
Break the rules
Don’t be afraid to fail
Don’t listen to naysayers
Work your butt off
The greatest gift that you ever give is your own Happiness. When you are in a state of joy or appreciation, you are connected to the Stream of Source Energy that is truly who~you~are ... and anything or anyone that you are holding as your object of attention ~ benefits from your attention!!
~~~~Abraham (Esther Hicks)
Learn, Educate, Release, Accept, Grow, Share, Love
Intro & Prosperity Calls
Take the Winners Pledge
Move Into Your Heart Space
Ambassador Bonus Awards
Level 3 30 Points+
Cash Award of $250,000 plus...
$50,000 in prizes
378 Chuck L
349 Harris F
291 Carol D
244 Monica L
227 Terry G
223 Judi H
215 Sandra C
154 Kevin C
153 Carlos P
147 Erika M
129 Christopher W
128 Richard H
104 Michael J
97 Diane & Glenn H
95 Jose T. C
84 Carmen C
84 Tim M
75 Gaura T
70 Henk K
67 Gaetano F
66 Joanne A
64 Marie S
61 Michael H
50 Kenneth N
47 Lois G
47 Ray E
44 Karlton R
39 Dale & Debbie O
44 Mervin O
42 Kevin C
40 Debbie H
39 John P. Y
37 Judy C
37 Vicki S
35 Bridget B
35 Wendy S
34 Flora L
33 Marco B
32 Rillea P
31 Eric D
. 30 Charles F
30 Craig P
30 Millie-Jo T
30 Tedd P
Level 2 20 Points+
Cash Award of $100,000
29 Arthur V
28 Gideon K
26 Svetlana Y
25 Alan K
25 Dominiqe O
25 Doug L
25 Giglio M
24 Lorna B
24 Monica P
24 Vicki K
23 Gordon W
23 Jeanine L
22 Elizabeth B
22 Francisca S
22 Tom L
21 Tom B
20 Beverly W
20 Dennis S
20 Dottie O
20 Fred G
20 Gail S
20 Jeanette M
20 Judith M
20 Kenneth H
20 Lilany R
20 Michael A
20 Randy T
20 Robb Z
20 Zacharias K
Level 1 10 Points+
Cash Award of $50,000
19 Robb Z
19 Virginia R
17 Gerald M
17 Gwendolyn J
16 Doug L
16 Sandra M
16 Marisol D
15 Buena M
15 Claire L
15 Cody B
15 Denise L
15 Dudley M
15 Gerald B
15 Jill H
15 John S
15 Kathy C
15 Linda S
15 Mario G
15 Nik S
15 Paul P
15 Reg D
14 Darlene W
14 Edward L
14 Emma T
13 Janice T
13 Karen T
13 Warren E
12 Chandra A
12 Darlene W
12 Herma G
12 Jeremy D
12 Mary R
12 Milton H
12 Musuai S
12 Robert L
12 Sheldon S
12 Susan D
12 Wilber P
11 Antoinette B
11 John P
11 Maria G
11 Mary R
10 Angela P
10 Bruce H
10 Carmen R
10 Charlene L
10 Cheryl W-S
10 Cindy C
10 Claire L
10 Cora B
10 Dale L
10 Dana B
10 David H
10 Eileen B
10 Frank L
10 Fred & Lorna K
10 George B
10 George H
10 Githa H
10 Harold C
10 Jacques B
10 Jeremy B
10 Jerry E
10 Jerry N
10 Jose G
10 Julio H
10 Julia V
10 Kay M
10 Kenneth S
10 Lilly B
10 Linda N
10 Lucill B
10 Mauro N
10 Marc R
10 Marcus T
10 Margarita R
10 Merv H
10 Murray L
10 Nora A
10 Paula B
10 Pauliasi T
10 Pauline T
10 Reul & Lisa M
10 Roberte J-H
10 Ronald D
10 Teresa M
10 Trudie G
10 Virginia M
10 Willy D
You cannot get what you’ve never had unless you’re willing to do what you’ve never done.
When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it - always.
- Mahatma Gandhi
The Lion asked the Wizard one time, "When does a slave become a king?"
"When You start acting like one! "
Otherwise You remain a slave all Your life.
We The People
Our country was created by People that wanted to be free!
And it also starts out by telling us that the attorneys were mislead in their Law Schools.
Then we have Published Works of Jeremy Bentham from the very beginning of our country. The problem with Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries is that he was explaining Common Law as it was at that time in England and our Founding Fathers only adopted common law of England, and all statutes and acts of parliament made prior to the fourth year of the reign of James the first.
Documentation from Missouri:
"Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri as
Sec. 1. The common law of England, and all statutes and acts of
parliament made prior to the fourth year of the reign of James the
first, and which are of a general nature, not local to that kingdom,
which common law and statutes are not repugnant to, or inconsistent
with, the constitution of the United States, the constitution of this
state, or the statute laws in force for the time being, shall be the
rule of action and decision in this state, any law, usage or custom,
to the contrary notwithstanding.
"It is lawyers who run our civilization for us-our governments, our businesses, our private lives. ...We cannot buy a home or rent an apartment, we cannot get married or try to get divorced, we cannot leave our property to our children without calling on the lawyers to guide us. To guide us, incidentally, through a maze of confusing gestures and formalities that lawyers have created. ...The legal trade, in short, is nothing but a high-class racket." http://thinkexist.com/quotes/fred_rodell/
Our research parallels what Utah Supreme Court Justice A. H. Ellett report on
Ellett explains how our character was changed but it does not explain where the Federal Corporation came from! Please let me know if you are interested in that research.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
All rights reserved,
/S/ Steven Pattison, one of the People within the boundaries of Kansas, a state of the Union.
Contact 9 to 5 pm cst time - 913.491.0320
"The limits of tyrants are perscribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." Frederick Douglass 1857
No Ruling from Supreme Court
|February 26, 2008
SCOTUS Says "NO"
What Must A Free People Do?
This Saturday: Schulz Speaks in Tampa
Next: Schulz to Speak in TX, NM, AZ
On February 25, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States, without comment, voted again not to hear We The People v. United States. Thus, SCOTUS ducked its Constitutional duty, yet again, to declare the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment.
The Court elected not to be put into the position of having to declare the unalienable Right of the People to hold the Government accountable to the Constitution's essential principles, enumerated powers and explicit prohibitions.
Instead, the Court has chosen to conspire with the political branches in a collective decision to protect, preserve and enhance the treasonous notion that constitutional violations are mere issues of current public policy, subject only to the will of the majority of People voting in precincts and the halls of Congress.
Beginning this Saturday, March 1st, Bob Schulz will be speaking at various venues to discuss the matter at hand. Everyone is encouraged to attend one of these most serious meetings. There is no charge to attend. WTP will not be providing any food or beverage. The meeting will be all "business."
Saturday March 1st, 1 - 3 PM
Radisson Clearwater Central
20967 US Highway 19 N,
(727) 799-1181 Click here for an event flyer (.pdf).
Saturday/Sunday, March 8/9: Austin, TX: (details later)
Saturday afternoon, March 15th Houston, TX (details later)
Sunday afternoon, March 16th Dallas, TX (details later)
Tuesday evening, March 18th Albuquerque, NM (details later)
Wednesday evening, March 19th Phoenix, AZ (details later)
Thursday evening, March 20th Tucson, AZ (details later)
Friday evening, March 21nd El Paso, TX (details later)
Monday evening, March 24th Austin, TX (details later)
Please consider a donation.
Your generous support is all that keeps our important work moving forward.
Please consider a donation to help finance the
critically important work of the WTP Foundation.
Our Home Page is www.GiveMeLiberty.org
|November 6, 2007
|50 States Sued to Block Computerized Vote Counting
Federal Court to be Asked to Delay Primaries
On October 2nd we posted an article in which we announced that the Clean Election Lawsuit was being expanded to all fifty states. We said we were in the process of filing an amended complaint to name all of the nation's chief election officials as defendants.
We also announced that we were looking for up to three volunteers from each state to become plaintiffs and/or friends of the lawsuit. The response was very strong. We thank each and every one of the 610 people who responded to this call for action.
Plaintiffs from every state brought the suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York and maintain that current election practices, including the widespread use of computerized voting machines, are unconstitutional because they are ripe for fraud and error and effectively hide the physical vote counting process from the public, effectively denying citizens their legally protected Right to cast an effective vote.
Click Here To Access the Full Update
Year-End Fund Raiser Underway!
2008 Freedom Calendars Now Available
Click here to donate and obtain your 2008 Freedom Calendar package!
To make a secure, tax-deductible donation to the WTP Foundation, please click here: Donation. You can make a one-time or recurring donation and can also establish the dates the secure transactions are processed each month.
Our Home Page is www.GiveMeLiberty.org
Add Yourself To Our e-Mail List
The Landmark Right-To-Petition Lawsuit
and Operations of the WTP Foundation
are Funded Solely By Your Generous Support.
Sept 22, 2007
|WTP Initiates National "Clean Elections" Lawsuit
Ten states are being sued to prevent the use of computerized voting systems during the 2008 primary and general elections and beyond. The lawsuit seeks to halt the use of machine-based voting systems and vote counting procedures that hide the ballots and the counting of votes from the People.
The complaint challenges the constitutionality of current voting procedures in the states, claiming that they "heighten the possibility of confusion, deception, frustration, and fraud." It contends that the existing practices are constitutionally deficient and prevent open, verifiable, transparent voting, and that the use of discredited electronic voting machines and flawed vote counting procedures drastically increase the likelihood of error and election fraud. The lawsuit calls for a visible chain of ballot custody with paper ballots kept in full public view throughout the voting, counting, and tallying process.
The lawsuit asks the Court to prohibit the states from conducting elections that are not open, verifiable, transparent and machine and computer free.
The US Supreme Court has declared the meaning of the Right to vote, as guaranteed by the US Constitution. Individuals not only have the Right to cast a vote, they have the Right to cast an effective vote, meaning they have the Right to have their vote counted accurately.
"We need to bring transparency and accountability to the voting process throughout the states," said Bob Schulz, who wrote the brief and is spearheading the nationwide effort. "We need to reclaim our vote and ensure that our voices are heard and that our votes are accurately counted. The only sure way to do that is to have the People, in the light of day, observe, verify, and secure the votes cast on paper ballots and to count those ballots before the public by hand."
The ten states that have been sued thus far include New York, New Hampshire, Illinois, South Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Iowa, Texas, California and Oregon.
We are in the process of serving the Complaint on each state.
Click here to read the Complaint.
If you have received this email accidently and wish to be removed, please send your response to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please be aware that these messages affect your individual human freedoms,
individual human rights, and individual liberty, all of which are supposed
to be protected by the Constitution.
|July 19, 2007
Withholding On The Ropes?
U.S. Unable To Prove It's Not Voluntary
The United States appears to have bitten off more than it can chew when it sued Bob Schulz and the We The People organizations earlier this year in an effort to shut down "Operation Stop Withholding."
In the lawsuit, the Government accused WTP of operating an unlawful "abusive tax shelter" in violation of IRC Sections 6700 and 6701, citing the organization's efforts to urge individuals to terminate their W-4 wage and salary withholding agreements.
In response to the lawsuit served on Schulz on May 3, 2007, Schulz filed a motion to have the case dismissed on the ground that Operation Stop Withholding is not only fully protected by the First Amend5ment (including the Petition clause), it is protected because We The People organization is educating People about the withholding laws as they are currently written and which expressly provide that such agreements are voluntary.
That is, the Government's lawsuit has asked the District Court to issue an injunction prohibiting WTP's efforts to educate Americans about the legal termination of private withholding agreements citing "black letter" law clearly establishing that Withholding Agreements (W-4s) are voluntary and that a worker can -- at any time -- terminate his W-4 by simply notifying the company that he no longer gives his permission to the company to withhold from his pay.
The Government finds itself in a very tough spot.
On one hand, it is asking the Court to shut the WTP program down, but on the other hand, neither the IRS nor the attorneys at the Department of Justice have been able to dispute or refute the simple truth that the letter of the law itself plainly establishes that withholding is voluntary and permission to withhold can be easily withdrawn by workers at their sole discretion.
Click Here To Access the Full Update
Our Home Page is www.GiveMeLiberty.org
Add Yourself To Our e-Mail List
IRS Needs Court Order
January 29, 2005
U.S. Court of Appeals Rules IRS
Cannot Apply Force Against A Tax Payer
Without A Court Order
Tax Payers Free To Ignore An IRS Summons
Queensbury, NY - On January 25, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that taxpayers cannot be compelled by the IRS to turn over personal and private property to the IRS, absent a federal court order.
Quoting from the decision (Schulz v. IRS, Case No. 04-0196-cv),
"...absent an effort to seek enforcement through a federal court, IRS summonses apply no force to taxpayers, and no consequence whatever can befall a taxpayer who refuses, ignores, or otherwise does not comply with an IRS summons until that summons is backed by a federal court order.[a taxpayer] cannot be held in contempt, arrested, detained, or otherwise punished for refusing to comply with the original IRS summons, no matter the taxpayer's reasons, or lack of reasons for so complying."
Without declaring those provisions of the Code unconstitutional on their face, the court, in effect, nullified key enforcement provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, stripping the IRS of much of its power to compel compliance with its administrative demands for personal and private property. The court characterized IRS summonses issued under Section 7602 as mere "requests."
The court went on to say that the federal courts are there to protect taxpayers from an "overreaching" IRS, and that the IRS must go through the federal courts before force can be applied on anyone by the IRS to turn over personal and private property to the IRS.
Our Home Page is http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm
Add Yourself To Our e-Mail List
Delete Yourself From Our e-Mail List
The Landmark Right-To-Petition Lawsuit and Operations of
the WTP Foundation are Funded Solely By Your Generous Support.
An Open Letter
To The President's Advisory Panel
On Federal Tax Reform:
Direct, Non-Apportioned Taxes On Labor
Are Strictly Prohibited
By The United States Constitution.
Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3:
"Representatives and Direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which
may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers.."
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4:
"No Capitation, or other direct Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the
Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken."
Every Related Supreme Court Decision
Confirms This Irrefutable Fact.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601 (1895)
Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916)
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916)
Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107
THE ANTELOPE, 23 U.S. 66 (1825)
Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746
Despite A Substantial Body Of
Legal Evidence Directly Challenging Its Authority,
The Internal Revenue Service,
(With the Direct Support Of The President,
U.S. Congress And Federal Courts,)
Continues To Enforce
This Unlawful and Immoral "Slave Tax"
On The Working People Of America.
It's Time To Stop
All Direct Taxes On Labor
And End The Income Tax Fraud.
Either America Still Has
And Bill Of Rights,
Or We Don't.
There Can Be NO Meaningful Tax Reform Until The Government Answers
Regarding The Constitutional
Taxing Authority Of The IRS
For the May, 2004 WTP letter to the President go to:
Here Are Some Of The Questions
Put Forth to the President
on May 10, 2004:
Admit or deny that the current tax on the wages of ordinary Americans is an un-apportioned direct tax.
Admit or deny that generically speaking, taxes on "income" have been classified as excise taxes by the Supreme Court in Brushaber v Union Pac. R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916).
Admit or deny that the Supreme Court, in Brushaber v Union Pac. R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), rejected the idea that the 16th Amendment granted to the government the power to impose an
un-apportioned direct tax, such as the current tax on wages.
Admit or deny that the Supreme Court, in Brushaber v Union Pac. R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), ruled that any contention that the 16th Amendment treats a tax on income as a direct tax
is wholly without foundation.
Admit or deny that the Supreme Court, in Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916), ruled that 16th Amendment did not confer any new power of taxation, (as would be a power to impose an un-apportioned direct tax on the wages of ordinary Americans,) but merely prohibited the complete and plenary power to tax income derived from labor or capital from being taken out of the category of un-apportioned indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged.
Admit or deny that one more than one half of the federal Appeals courts have ruled that the current tax on wages of ordinary Americans is an un-apportioned direct tax while the remaining Appeals courts have ruled the same tax to be an un-apportioned indirect tax.
Admit or deny that the United States Supreme Court defined "income" to mean the following:
".Whatever difficulty there may be about a precise scientific definition of ?income,' it imports, as used here, something entirely distinct from principal or capital either as a subject of taxation or as a measure of the tax; conveying rather the idea of gain or increase arising from corporate activities."
"This court had decided in the Pollock Case that the income tax law of 1894 amounted in effect to a direct tax upon property, and was invalid because not apportioned according to populations, as prescribed by the Constitution. The act of 1909 avoided this difficulty by imposing not an income tax, but an excise tax upon the conduct of business in a corporate capacity, measuring, however, the amount of tax by the income of the corporation." Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107, 55 L.Ed. 389, 31 Sup.Ct.Rep. 342, Ann. Cas."
Here Are More Facts:
For additional details go to:
The Constitution guarantees that no person can be deprived of his or her property except by due process of law. However, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Courts, routinely and systemically conspire to enforce the income tax through intimidation, coercion and outright fraud.
For a disturbing example of these prosecutorial practices, read the trial transcript and criminal appeal of Texas businessman Dick Simkanin who was finally convicted in 2004 of failure to withhold taxes from his workers after three grand juries, two criminal trials, and a federal judge who denied his attorneys the right to enter a single piece of paper in his defense -- and who never required the DOJ to cite ANY law that imposed a specific legal duty upon Simkanin to file or withhold.
Is this the tax system
of a free nation?
For the past five years, the President, United States Congress, Department of Justice and Internal Revenue Service have steadfastly REFUSED to answer specific legal questions directly challenging the lawful authority of the U.S. Government to impose and enforce a direct, non-apportioned tax on the wages and salaries of American workers.
The We The People Foundation, along with several thousand ordinary Americans, have been forced to bring a lawsuit against our own government to finally expose the truth about America's fraudulent income tax system. USDC (DC) Case No. 04-CV-01211
In recent court filings, the U.S. Government has taken the position that it has "no legal obligation" to answer, respond or even READ the Peoples First Amendment Petitions for Redress of Grievances, which thoroughly document the federal income tax fraud.
Does This Sound Like A
"Servant" Government Created
Of, By and For The People?
Learn More About Our Efforts
To Restore Constitutional Order
To America's Tax System
The Landmark "Right-To-Petition" Lawsuit
To Force Our Government To Answer:
"No Answers, NO Taxes."
We The People Foundation
For Constitutional Education, Inc.
2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, NY 12804
Robert L. Schulz, Chairman
You are cordially invited to attend,
A Constitution Class moderated by Rebecca O'Dell Townsend on four (4) non-consecutive Saturdays:
August 4, 11, 25, and September 1, 2007
Time: 8:30am to 12:30pm. Tampa Bay location to be announced.
Cost: $15.00 to cover book and workbook.
The class will feature the DVD series by the National Center for Constitutional Studies: The 5000 Year Leap: Principles of Freedom 101.
To reserve your seat, contact: email@example.com
Even if you can not attend all four sessions, it will be well worth your time and money to receive the book and workbook. The book alone sells for $19.95. It is a "must read" for every American man, woman and child.
Voluntary Income Tax
Learn The Truth About The "Voluntary" Income Tax!
March 21, 2005
Tax Panel Chairman:
WTP Supporters Confront Tax Panel In Chicago The "Fix" Is In, Unless We Act.
"Constitutionality of The Income Tax
On Wednesday morning March 16, a group of WTP supporters gathered at the University of Chicago downtown campus with signs, information packets, and reprints of the full-page ad WTP recently ran in The Washington Times to hand out to members of the press and other attendees of the meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform.
After a minor confrontation with a U.S. Treasury security detail questioning the activities of the WTP group, security officials, with the full blessing of the Chicago police, eventually allowed WTP to continue its activities outside the meeting hall. In addition, members of the group were allowed into the building to attend the meeting.
The modestly sized (7-8) group was successful in engaging and distributing information packets to members of the press, the panel's witnesses, the public and those attending the meeting. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley was one of the people who accepted an ad reprint. He was observed studying it as his limousine pulled away.
Click Here To Access The Full Update
Will Not Be Addressed."
The Truth Shall Set You Free
Freedom Club USA
All material on this site is protected under the copyright laws of the United States for the express protection of their creators.
© Copyright 2004-2017 Freedom Foundation USA, LLC
All rights reserved.